Allegedly,
A wealthy family goes to Hawaii for a vaction. No surprises there. But for the Thomsen family of Toronto, it had an added bonus. They found a snazzy new camera!
Well, not exactly new - it actually belonged to Judith. She had lost it just a short while earlier, during her own trip to the Island. Being good, card-carrying Canadians, they promptly contacted the rightful owner of the camera and returned it, along with memory cards containing over 500 images.
Well, no, actually.
I'm sorry if you've read all of this somewhere else already, but his tale has curdled my tapas.
Sometime during the week, the Thomsen family fell in love with their expensive new toy ($500.oo U.S., plus two memory cards). Their nine-year-old son thought it was too neat to give back. In a telephone conversation with the budding thieves, Judith was informed that she would never see her camera again. There was no dispute as to whose camera it was. She identified it, down to the colour of elastic band she'd put around the body. They agreed that it was hers, they just decided not to give the camera back.
"Well," Mother Thomsen said, "we have a bit of a situation. You see, my nine year old son found your camera, and we wanted to show him to do the right thing, so we called, but now he's been using it for a week and he really loves it and we can't bear to take it from him." |
What if the child had found a gun?
So, the little tyke now learns the fantastc new world of thievery. Take what you can. Forget right and wrong.
I'm not really all that worried about the poor child in this, other than to say that the kid was damaged before the incident. How else would the kid have come to the conclusion that this was an okay thing to do? Perhaps too much T.V.?
I'm sure that it has nothing to do with the parents.
"This is an expensive camera, you know...", says Judith.
"Oh, we know, we looked it up.", replies the clever mom. |
In any event, the honest and rightfull owner of the camera asked if that maybe they could just send her the memory cards (containing over 500 photos). Sure, they said - they were full of the milk of human kindness. Good Honest Folk.
Two weeks go by, and the poor woman gets a box in the mail containing a couple of CD's with her images burned to them.
When Judith commented that she had expected the return of her memory cards, the Thomsen gang told her that she was "…lucky we sent you anything at all. Most people wouldn't do that."
Yes, if by most people you mean those involved in criminal organizations.
Okay, now it gets weird.
If you've been to boingboing lately, you likely know the story. A person identifying himself as a "Lawer" (must be like Lawyer, but without the ambiguity of that damned letter 'y') took umbrage at an article in boingboing concerning the camera theft.
The lawer, identified himself as Don Deveny and threatens to sue for slander over "deflamorty" statements. Deflamorty??? Maybe it has something to do with fire.
Makes me wonder how ol' Don made it through Lau Skool. Specially 'cause it seems to me that slander is spoken and liable is written. You'd think a fancy lawer would know that. Also, no names appear anywhere in the boingboing article. I know I've missed a few episodes of "Law & Order: Camera Thieves Pretending to be Lawers ", but don't you actually have to name a person to commit slander/libel? Otherwise, it'd be a case of, umm - no case at all.
Now, if you like to read email exchanges between idiots pretending to be lawyers and rational human beings, you owe it to yourself to check out the small email saga.
Oddly enough, someone with many of the same language, spelling and grammar problems is now posting to Judith's blog. He posts under the name 'phantomca' and his comments all run along the lines of:
"thats funny youve offered no proof that its yours or any one elses why should we belive that its yours ?". |
He actually says at one point that "I am a lawer in Toronto". Maybe he went to the same school as the guy who's sueing boingboing? Maybe it's the same camera-stealing knob that misspells the word 'lawyer' at every turn.
Hey, just a word of advice fella, when you decide to illegally impersonate a member of a given profession, at least learn how to spell the name of that profession.
And, through internet searching that wouldn't impress a three-year-old, it turns out that phantomca is actually a guy named Dave Thomsen
On an entirely unrelated note, Dave (phantomca) has been bidding on memory cards on eBay.

February 23rd
2006
|